Terms: evidence context, not a guarantee of platform outcomes.

EDGE: READY
More options
What are you checking?
EXAMPLE Checked static example Cache n/a NOT LIVE
IP

8.8.8.8

EXAMPLERUN A LIVE CHECK
ASN
AS15169 · Google LLCgoogle.com
LOCATION
US · California, Mountain View
IPBot
🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View
IPinfo
🇺🇸 US · AS15169
GeoLite2
🇺🇸 US
DB-IP
🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View
Bright Data
🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View
ROUTE
ANNOUNCED 8.8.8.0/24
IP TYPE
PUBLIC INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE
Not assessedIPJURY SCOREEXPERIMENTAL · NOT A PROBABILITY IPJURY VERDICT EXAMPLE

Run a live check for an evidence verdict and experimental interpretation.

Why this result · full calculation

Run a live check. The example is not scored.

    Evidence confidence is not prediction accuracy. A provisional range spans policy outcomes for unanswered questions; it is not a probability interval.

    OPEN FULL EVIDENCE REPORT

    JURY READY

    Enter an address, or check your own connection · the example below is replaced in place

    FULL REPORT IDENTITY · SOURCE MATRIX · SIX-AXIS VERDICT · EVIDENCE RECORD
    EVIDENCE SNAPSHOTSEPARATE AXES · NOT A SCORE
    ANONYMITY
    No direct anonymity evidence observed
    ABUSE EVIDENCE
    No abuse evidence in covered sources
    COVERAGE
    6/7 jurors responded
    01

    IDENTITY

    COORDINATES
    not loaded in static example
    ROUTING
    ROUTE ORIGIN OBSERVED
    PREFIX
    8.8.8.0/24
    TIMEZONE
    America/Los_Angeles
    REVERSE DNS
    not loaded in static example
    STACK
    IPv4
    RANGE
    8.8.8.0 – 8.8.8.255
    REGISTRY
    not loaded in static example
    02

    SOURCE MATRIX

    4 location sources agree at country level · — not covered · W/H withheld

    SIGNALIPBotIPinfoGeoLite2DB-IPIPtoASN
    COUNTRYUSUSUSUS
    CITYCalifornia, Mountain ViewCalifornia, Mountain View
    ASNAS15169AS15169AS15169AS15169
    PROXYNO
    VPNW/H
    TORNO
    HOSTINGNO
    ABUSENO
    03

    SIX-AXIS VERDICT

    NETWORK ROLEHIGH
    Public internet infrastructure

    Service role · anycast context · operator identity

    ANONYMITYMEDIUM
    No direct anonymity evidence observed

    No proxy, VPN, or Tor finding in covered fields

    ABUSE EVIDENCEMEDIUM
    No abuse evidence in covered sources

    This means “not observed,” never “clean”

    GEO CONTEXTLOW
    US · single geolocation estimate

    Country-level context; physical location not proven

    ROUTINGHIGH
    Route origin observed · RPKI state withheld by licence

    Origin ASN · announced prefix · route-origin conflict

    COVERAGEMEDIUM
    6/7 jurors responded

    Named jurors · lineage families · abstentions visible

    04

    EVIDENCE RECORD

    JURORAXISCLAIMCONF.STATUS
    Network identityIPBot networknetwork roleAS15169 · Google LLCHIGHRESPONDED
    Operator and role profileIPBot classificationnetwork rolepublic infrastructureHIGHRESPONDED
    Anonymity signalsIPBot classificationanonymityno direct proxy/VPN/Tor evidenceMEDIUMRESPONDED
    Direct threat evidenceIPBot evidenceabuseno direct record in covered evidenceMEDIUMRESPONDED
    REPORT ipjury.com/check/8.8.8.8 EXPERIMENTAL INDEX
    TERMINAL curl ipjury.com/8.8.8.8 irm ipjury.com/8.8.8.8
    IPJURY.COM · EVIDENCE, NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT SCORE

    IPJury uses the IP2Location LITE database for IP geolocation. This product includes GeoLite Data created by MaxMind, available from https://www.maxmind.com. IP Geolocation by DB-IP. Full source credits: source register.

    05

    TERMS OF USE

    IPJury provides evidence context, not a guarantee, certification, credit decision, identity conclusion, or platform outcome.

    Acceptable use

    Use the service for legitimate network diagnostics, research, abuse prevention, procurement checks, and troubleshooting. Do not use it to harass, deanonymize, evade law, overload sources, or make high-impact decisions without independent review.

    No platform guarantee

    IPJury cannot observe account history, device signals, behavior, payment, cookies, private reputation data, or platform-specific policies. No result guarantees access, registration, payment approval, streaming unlock, or avoidance of verification.

    Evidence limits

    IP data changes, sources can be delayed or unavailable, and classifications can be wrong. “No evidence observed” is not “safe” or “clean.” Geolocation is approximate. PTR is a weak clue. Prefix context is not a direct IP record.

    API

    Single-IP use is offered without a key subject to reasonable limits. Automated bulk extraction, resale, mirroring, or attempts to create a substitute intelligence feed are not authorized.

    Availability

    The service is provided as available and may change, degrade, or suspend sources to preserve licensing, security, or reliability.

    06

    A NUMBER NEEDS ITS EVIDENCE

    IPJury keeps network type, anonymity, abuse, location, routing and coverage separate. Its optional experimental index explains a published policy over those facts; it never replaces the named evidence verdict or conceals missing information.

    MYSTERY SCORE MODEL
    83/100

    What does 83 measure? Who supplied it? Is hosting being treated as abuse? Did one heuristic outweigh a direct record? A number cannot tell you that two of its sources flatly contradicted each other.

    • Cross-axis averaging
    • Hidden source lineage
    • Missing source treated as “false”
    • Disagreement averaged away
    • Platform outcome implied
    EVIDENCE + EXPLAINED INTERPRETATION
    BANDDISPUTED RULEsource-conflict ROLEhosting ANONYMITYno direct evidence ABUSEno record observed GEOcountry disputed ROUTINGorigin observed COVERAGE6/7 responded

    One rule read one axis and named the state. The axes it did not read stay beside it. “Disputed” and “too little coverage to say” are answers a single number cannot express.

    07

    THE FIVE RULES OF EVIDENCE

    [ READ FULL METHOD ]
    1. 01

      Vote only on the same axis

      A proxy flag, an abuse report, a hosting role, and a city estimate are not interchangeable votes.

    2. 02

      Direct evidence outranks a prior

      An exact-IP record is different from an inference based on the ASN, prefix, or network category.

    3. 03

      Deduplicate source lineage

      Three websites backed by one upstream database do not become three independent evidence families.

    4. 04

      Let jurors abstain

      Timeout, no IPv6 coverage, disabled license, or missing record is shown—not silently converted to “no.”

    5. 05

      Explain dissent

      CGNAT, anycast, reassignment, data age, and route context can all produce legitimate disagreement.

    09

    QUESTIONS THE SCORE CANNOT ANSWER

    Can I use IPJury output in my own work or report?

    Yes for legitimate diagnostics, research, procurement checks and troubleshooting. Some sources carry attribution requirements, which appear in the record itself, and bulk redistribution is not authorized.

    Does a result guarantee that a service will accept an address?

    No. IPJury provides evidence context and cannot guarantee access, registration, payment approval, regional availability or the absence of verification prompts.

    What is IPJury not suitable for?

    Identity conclusions, credit decisions, deanonymizing a person, or any high-impact decision taken without independent review. It describes an address, not a person.

    Is the service guaranteed to stay available with every source enabled?

    No. It is provided as available, and individual sources can be changed, degraded or suspended to preserve licensing, security or reliability.

    IPJURY // RECORD

    Methodology