Is this IP's country on OpenAI's supported list for ChatGPT?

EDGE: READY

More options

What are you checking?

EXAMPLE Checked static example Cache n/a NOT LIVE

8.8.8.8

EXAMPLERUN A LIVE CHECK

ASN

AS15169 · Google LLCgoogle.com

ASN TRAFFIC

Cloudflare Radar · checking snapshot…

Share of HTML requests Cloudflare classified as human or bot across the whole ASN, last 7 days. It describes the network, not this IP's human probability, and never feeds the evidence band or the score.

Chart by Cloudflare Radar · CC BY 4.0 · Native percentages, when shown: Cloudflare Radar HTTP summary data · CC BY-NC 4.0, non-commercial use on this free tool · ASN-wide, not this IPCloudflare Radar ↗

Blank or blocked? Reload, or open the official source beside the licence line. Chart availability does not change the IP verdict.

LOCATION

US 5/5 AGREE

IPBot

🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View

IPinfo

🇺🇸 US · AS15169

GeoLite2

🇺🇸 US

DB-IP

🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View

Bright Data

🇺🇸 US · California, Mountain View

ROUTE

ANNOUNCED 8.8.8.0/24

IP TYPE

PUBLIC INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE

ANONYMITY

No direct anonymity evidence observed

ABUSE

No abuse evidence in covered sources

IPJURY SCOREEXPERIMENTAL · NOT A PROBABILITY Not assessed EXAMPLE

Run a live check for an evidence verdict and experimental interpretation.

Why this result · full calculation

Run a live check. The example is not scored.

Evidence confidence is not prediction accuracy. A provisional range spans policy outcomes for unanswered questions; it is not a probability interval.

A source names this exact address in a record against it.

Adverse context was observed; no covered record names this exact IP.

Sources disagree. Review the conflicting location or routing records.

Some evidence is unavailable. LIMITED describes coverage, not an adverse finding.

No source covered here reports anything against this address.

Platforms also weigh account, device, payment and behaviour signals no IP check can see.

is not a public internet address, so no external IP evidence check is made.

This address is in Shared Address Space (100.64.0.0/10), used inside provider networks. It is not a public exit address. This lookup cannot establish how many subscribers share your public connection; no external source was queried.

It is a hosting address, which many platforms treat with more friction than a home connection — that is a role, not a finding.

Sources identify a mobile network role. That alone does not establish whether this exit is shared.

Sources identify a residential network role, not an exclusive household connection.

It answers public infrastructure queries, which is a role rather than a finding.

It is a Tor exit, which is a network role and not an abuse record.

It carries privacy-relay evidence, which is a network role and not an abuse record.

Enter one IPv4 or IPv6 address to convene the jury.

That is not an IPv4 or IPv6 address. Try 8.8.8.8 or 2606:4700:4700::1111.

This connection has made too many lookups and the counter clears shortly.

The lookup counter has cleared. Run the check again.

This deployment has no active source licence profile, so no evidence may be shown. Retrying will not change that.

The request never reached IPJury. Check the connection and run it again.

The sources did not answer in time, so no verdict was reached. Nothing is concluded about this address either way.

OPEN FULL EVIDENCE REPORT

JURY READY

Enter an address, or check your own connection · the example below is replaced in place

FULL REPORT IDENTITY · SOURCE MATRIX · SIX-AXIS VERDICT · EVIDENCE RECORD

IDENTITY

COORDINATES: not loaded in static example
ROUTING: ROUTE ORIGIN OBSERVED
PREFIX: 8.8.8.0/24
TIMEZONE: America/Los_Angeles
REVERSE DNS: not loaded in static example
STACK: IPv4
RANGE: 8.8.8.0 – 8.8.8.255
REGISTRY: not loaded in static example

SOURCE MATRIX

4 location sources agree at country level · — not covered · W/H withheld

SIGNAL	IPBot	IPinfo	GeoLite2	DB-IP	IPtoASN
COUNTRY	US	US	US	US	—
CITY	California, Mountain View	—	—	California, Mountain View	—
ASN	AS15169	AS15169	AS15169	—	AS15169
PROXY	NO	—	—	—	—
VPN	W/H	—	—	—	—
TOR	NO	—	—	—	—
HOSTING	NO	—	—	—	—
ABUSE	NO	—	—	—	—

SIX-AXIS VERDICT

NETWORK ROLEHIGH

Public internet infrastructure

Service role · anycast context · operator identity

ANONYMITYMEDIUM

No direct anonymity evidence observed

No proxy, VPN, or Tor finding in covered fields

ABUSE EVIDENCEMEDIUM

No abuse evidence in covered sources

This means “not observed,” never “clean”

GEO CONTEXTLOW

US · single geolocation estimate

Country-level context; physical location not proven

ROUTINGHIGH

Route origin observed · RPKI state withheld by licence

Origin ASN · announced prefix · route-origin conflict

COVERAGEMEDIUM

6/7 jurors responded

Named jurors · lineage families · abstentions visible

EVIDENCE RECORD

JUROR	AXIS	CLAIM	CONF.	STATUS
Network identityIPBot network	network role	AS15169 · Google LLC	HIGH	RESPONDED
Operator and role profileIPBot classification	network role	public infrastructure	HIGH	RESPONDED
Anonymity signalsIPBot classification	anonymity	no direct proxy/VPN/Tor evidence	MEDIUM	RESPONDED
Direct threat evidenceIPBot evidence	abuse	no direct record in covered evidence	MEDIUM	RESPONDED

{
  "example": true,
  "message": "Run a live check to load the evidence contract."
}

WHAT OPENAI'S COUNTRY PAGES CAN AND CANNOT TELL YOU

Is the country this IP is located in on OpenAI’s ChatGPT supported list?

IPJury compares the country its location sources agree on with OpenAI’s published list for ChatGPT on web and mobile, and separately with the OpenAI API list, each with its retrieval date. When the sources disagree, return no country, or the country carries exceptions, the reading is withheld and says why.

Evidence scope and register licence-review dates — not live lookup dates
Source	Register review
OpenAI supported countries and territories (ChatGPT, OpenAI API)	2026-09-17
IP2Location LITE DB11 (via IPBot)	2026-08-07

Source availability depends on the current deployment and each returned record. These review dates do not establish when a particular IP was observed. Method axis-scope-2026-09-15 · Score ipjury-score-v3.

OpenAI keeps two supported-country pages: a Help Center article listing where it supports access to ChatGPT on web and mobile, and a developer page for the OpenAI API. This check compares an address's agreed location country with both, names the retrieval date, and stops there. Nothing is sent to OpenAI, and the result is not a connection test.

Two pages, two claims

The ChatGPT article and the API page are separate documents, and IPJury reads them as separate products. As retrieved on 2026-09-17 they list the same 208 entries, including territories such as the Faroe Islands, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, and the French Southern Territories. If one page changes before the other, the reading shows products_differ and a sentence per page instead of a combined verdict.

The Help Center article shows only a relative date ("Updated: last month"). IPJury therefore dates its copy by retrieval, sets a review-by date no more than 90 days later, and withholds the reading with policy_expired once that date passes.

The sentence OpenAI puts above its lists

Both pages say that accessing or offering access to OpenAI's services outside the listed countries and territories may result in an account being blocked or suspended. IPJury quotes the list and leaves that consequence where OpenAI put it. A reading does not say that an account will be suspended, that it will not be, or why an account already was. Those decisions rest on account, payment, device and usage information that no IP lookup observes.

Where country readings go wrong

Location sources disagree. Estimates for re-assigned blocks, satellite and mobile networks can name different countries. The reading is then withheld as geolocation_disputed, never resolved by vote.
Exceptions inside a country. OpenAI lists "Ukraine (with certain exceptions)" without naming them on the page, so a Ukrainian address reads partial_country.
The address is not the person. A cloud server, corporate gateway, proxy or VPN exit has its own country. A listed country for that exit says nothing about where its users are, and an unlisted one says nothing about who they are.

Reading it from the command line

Add service=chatgpt to a JSON, stream, text, Markdown, BBCode or handover lookup to receive the same statements, the source and review dates, and the limit. Without the parameter every response is exactly as it was; an unknown service name is refused with 400 invalid_service before any lookup budget is spent.

A NUMBER NEEDS ITS EVIDENCE

IPJury keeps network type, anonymity, abuse, location, routing and coverage separate. Its optional experimental index explains a published policy over those facts; it never replaces the named evidence verdict or conceals missing information.

MYSTERY SCORE MODEL

83/100

What does 83 measure? Who supplied it? Is hosting being treated as abuse? Did one heuristic outweigh a direct record? A number cannot tell you that two of its sources flatly contradicted each other.

Cross-axis averaging
Hidden source lineage
Missing source treated as “false”
Disagreement averaged away
Platform outcome implied

EVIDENCE + EXPLAINED INTERPRETATION

BANDDISPUTED RULEsource-conflict ROLEhosting ANONYMITYno direct evidence ABUSEno record observed GEOcountry disputed ROUTINGorigin observed COVERAGE6/7 responded

One rule read one axis and named the state. The axes it did not read stay beside it. “Disputed” and “too little coverage to say” are answers a single number cannot express.

THE FIVE RULES OF EVIDENCE

[ READ FULL METHOD ]

01
Vote only on the same axis
A proxy flag, an abuse report, a hosting role, and a city estimate are not interchangeable votes.
02
Direct evidence outranks a prior
An exact-IP record is different from an inference based on the ASN, prefix, or network category.
03
Deduplicate source lineage
Three websites backed by one upstream database do not become three independent evidence families.
04
Let jurors abstain
Timeout, no IPv6 coverage, disabled license, or missing record is shown—not silently converted to “no.”
05
Explain dissent
CGNAT, anycast, reassignment, data age, and route context can all produce legitimate disagreement.

FOLLOW THE IP QUESTION

Each route opens in the same tool surface, preserving the active evidence session.

01Is this IP's country on Anthropic's supported list for Claude?READING ANTHROPIC'S TWO COUNTRY LISTS 02Registration country and usage country are two different claims.REGISTRATION COUNTRY VERSUS USAGE LOCATION 03What an IP address explains, and what only the platform knows.OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE VERSUS PLATFORM-PRIVATE SIGNALS 04Proxy, VPN, and Tor evidence without an abuse shortcut.WHAT COUNTS AS ANONYMITY EVIDENCE

QUESTIONS THE SCORE CANNOT ANSWER

Is this a test of whether ChatGPT works from this IP?

No. It compares the address's agreed location country with the countries OpenAI lists for ChatGPT and for its API. It sends nothing to OpenAI and cannot see account, device, payment or session checks.

What happens when location sources disagree about the country?

The reading is withheld with geolocation_disputed. IPJury does not pick the majority country for a service reading, because a wrong country would turn into a wrong list claim.

Does OpenAI say anything about access from outside its listed countries?

OpenAI's pages say that accessing or offering access outside the listed countries and territories may result in an account being blocked or suspended. IPJury quotes the list, not a prediction of what happens to any account.

Can I get the same reading from the API or the command line?

Yes. Add service=chatgpt to a JSON, stream, text, Markdown, BBCode or handover lookup. Without that parameter the response is unchanged, and an unknown service name returns a 400 invalid_service problem.

Is this IP's country on OpenAI's supported list for ChatGPT?

WHAT THIS REPORTS

PRIVACY

8.8.8.8

HOW THE BAND IS DECIDED

JURY READY

IDENTITY

REGISTRATION VERSUS LOCATION

SOURCE MATRIX

READING THE MATRIX

SIX-AXIS VERDICT

SIX AXES

AN OBSERVATION WINDOW, NOT A HISTORY OF THE ADDRESS

EVIDENCE RECORD

WHAT OPENAI'S COUNTRY PAGES CAN AND CANNOT TELL YOU

Is the country this IP is located in on OpenAI’s ChatGPT supported list?

Two pages, two claims

The sentence OpenAI puts above its lists

Where country readings go wrong

Reading it from the command line

A NUMBER NEEDS ITS EVIDENCE

THE FIVE RULES OF EVIDENCE

Vote only on the same axis

Direct evidence outranks a prior

Deduplicate source lineage

Let jurors abstain

Explain dissent

FOLLOW THE IP QUESTION

QUESTIONS THE SCORE CANNOT ANSWER

Methodology