Is this IP's country on Anthropic's supported list for Claude?

Is the country this IP is located in on Anthropic’s supported list?

IPJury takes the country its location sources agree on and compares it with Anthropic’s two published lists, one for commercial API access and one for Claude.ai, giving the retrieval date. A disputed or missing country, a country listed only with regional exceptions, or an expired copy of the list produces no reading rather than a guess.

Source availability depends on the current deployment and each returned record. These review dates do not establish when a particular IP was observed. Method axis-scope-2026-09-15 · Score ipjury-score-v3.

Anthropic publishes where it offers Claude as two lists on one page: countries, regions and territories with commercial API access, and those with Claude.ai access. This check reads those lists against the country IPJury's location sources agree on for an address. It is a dated comparison of two records, not a test of whether a connection will be accepted.

What the reading says, word for word

For each list the reading is one sentence: a country is or is not on Anthropic's supported list for the Claude API or for Claude.ai, with the date the list was retrieved, followed by whether the location sources agree or rest on a single estimate. The two lists stay two claims. They are identical as retrieved on 2026-09-17, and if they ever differ the reading reports each separately rather than merging them into one answer.

The country is the geolocation verdict of the ordinary IPJury record. It is not the registration country, not the country of the account, and not the country a payment card was issued in.

When there is no reading

A requested reading is always present, and it says why when it withholds a claim:

• geolocation_disputed — the location sources name different countries. IPJury does not pick the majority for a list claim, because a wrong country would become a wrong statement about Anthropic's list.
• no_country — no location source returned a country for the address.
• partial_country — the country is listed with regional exceptions. Anthropic lists Ukraine "except Crimea, Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk, and Zaporizhzhia regions"; a country-level location cannot settle which side of that line an address falls on.
• policy_expired — IPJury's copy of the list has passed its review-by date and is not restated until it is reviewed again.
• not_applicable and stale_record — a private or reserved address has no country, and a stale fallback record is too old to compare.

What the list itself does not cover

Anthropic's page also states that it may decline to serve entities whose majority ownership is attributable to nations other than those listed. That is a rule about ownership, and nothing about an IP address can show it. The same is true of account verification, age requirements, payment, device and behaviour signals. An address in a listed country is compatible with every one of those checks failing, and an address outside the list says nothing about who is using it.

Using it well

Treat the reading as a question to check, not a conclusion. If a hosted server, proxy or VPN exit is involved, the address's country and the user's country can differ, and a provider's terms may treat that difference as the user's responsibility. Read Anthropic's current page before relying on the list, and compare the reading with where the account holder actually is. The same reading is available from the API with service=claude.